Skip to main content

97 and Still Blunt – Celtics Legend Calls Out the Exact Mistake That Doomed Boston Against the Knicks

The Boston Celtics, fresh off a commanding 61-21 season and clinching the Eastern Conference’s No. 2 seed, entered the 2025 NBA Playoffs as defending champions with their sights set on a repeat. With a roster boasting stars like Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Jrue Holiday, and Kristaps Porzingis, the Celtics seemed poised for another deep postseason run. But the basketball gods had other plans, and a shocking second-round collapse against the New York Knicks left fans and analysts reeling.

Injuries were the first blow. Brown, Holiday, and Porzingis battled health issues that disrupted their rhythm and availability, leaving Boston vulnerable. By Game 4, the Celtics were staring down a 3-1 deficit against a Knicks team that, on paper, appeared inferior. Then, disaster struck: six-time All-Star Jayson Tatum suffered a devastating Achilles tendon rupture in the final minutes of the game. The injury sealed Boston’s fate, and they fell in six games, their championship dreams shattered.

Hall of Fame point guard Bob Cousy, who celebrated his 97th birthday on August 9, 2025, didn’t mince words when reflecting on the Celtics’ meltdown. In a candid conversation with The Boston Globe’s Dan Shaughnessy, the six-time NBA champion and Celtics legend tore into the team’s strategy, particularly their overreliance on three-point shooting, and didn’t hold back his disdain for the Knicks as a playoff foe.

“You have to be there to really feel the pulse of what’s happening, and I’m not,” Cousy admitted. “But from what I’ve seen, Joe Mazzulla did a solid job keeping the team focused. In my experience, though, the playoffs are where the best team wins. Upsets happen, sure, but I can’t wrap my head around how the Celtics crumbled—especially against the [expletive] Knicks. They showed in the next round they weren’t even true contenders.”

When Shaughnessy pointed out that many analysts pinned Boston’s playoff woes on their heavy dependence on three-point shooting, Cousy’s response was as sharp as ever. The Celtics, known for their modern, analytics-driven approach, leaned heavily on long-range shots, often at the expense of other offensive options. This strategy, Cousy argued, was their undoing.

“I like the three-pointer as a weapon,” Cousy said. “But not as the first [expletive] option. It’s always there for you—you don’t have to force it. Why abandon everything else? Driving to the basket, creating contact, getting to the line—that’s how you control the game.”

Cousy’s critique wasn’t just about shot selection; it was a clash of basketball philosophies. While the Celtics’ front office, led by Danny Ainge and Brad Stevens, has embraced the analytics revolution, Cousy remains a staunch advocate for old-school, inside-out play. He pointed to Knicks All-NBA point guard Jalen Brunson as a prime example of what Boston lacked. Brunson, unlike Tatum and Brown, prioritized attacking the paint, generating offense through drives and physicality.

“I know analytics rule the game now, and I can’t argue with a computer,” Cousy said with a hint of exasperation. “But I know what I’ve seen in my time. There’s value in going to the rim first, setting the tone, and then using the three when it’s there. I’ll take that belief to my grave, no matter what Danny or Brad think. The coaches they hire clearly buy into their philosophy, and that’s what we’re stuck with.”

Cousy’s words carry the weight of a man who’s seen it all. A cornerstone of the Celtics’ dynasty in the 1950s and 60s, he helped deliver six championships to Boston with a style of play that emphasized fundamentals, teamwork, and adaptability. At 97, his passion for the game—and his frustration with the modern Celtics’ approach—remains undimmed.

The Knicks, as Cousy noted, were exposed as pretenders in the following round, making Boston’s collapse all the more galling. For a team with championship pedigree, losing to a rival they were expected to dominate stung deeply. Cousy’s critique isn’t just a lament for a lost season; it’s a call to rethink the balance between analytics and instinct, between the three-pointer and the paint.