The Boston Celtics are at a crossroads. With Jayson Tatum sidelined, nursing a ruptured Achilles, the 2024 NBA champions are retooling their roster and identity on the fly. Key pieces from their title run have departed, and the front office is threading the needle between developing young talent and staying competitive in a loaded Eastern Conference. As the Celtics navigate this bridge year, whispers of a blockbuster trade have emerged, with ClutchPoints’ Rohan Brahmbhatt floating an audacious target: six-time All-Star DeMar DeRozan. The idea is bold, polarizing, and could reshape the NBA landscape—but is it the right move for Boston?
Why DeRozan Could Be Boston’s Missing Piece
DeMar DeRozan is a scoring maestro, a half-court savant who thrives when the game slows to a crawl. Last season, he posted 22.2 points, 4.4 assists, and 3.9 rebounds per game, proving he’s still a reliable offensive engine. His ability to create clean looks in crunch time—where possessions grind and defenses tighten—makes him a tantalizing fit for a Celtics team craving stability without Tatum.
Embed X: https://twitter.com/CelticsMuse/status/1697382376106611123
In Boston’s system, DeRozan’s mid-post dominance and foul-drawing prowess could unlock new dimensions. Picture Jaylen Brown setting screens or rolling short to collapse defenses, creating space for cutters and shooters like Derrick White, who excels relocating off the ball. DeRozan’s deliberate pacing would keep outlets open, ensuring the offense hums even when the shot clock dwindles. For second-unit lineups, he’d be a lifeline, anchoring groups that struggle to generate pull-up shooting. His veteran presence could steady the ship during Tatum’s recovery, allowing younger players to develop without sacrificing wins.
Looking ahead, DeRozan’s role could evolve into a matchup-driven weapon once Tatum returns. His ability to punish smaller defenders in the post or draw fouls in critical moments would add a new layer to Boston’s postseason arsenal. In a bridge year, DeRozan’s proven closing ability could be the difference between a deep playoff run and an early exit.
The Case Against DeRozan: Why Boston Might Hesitate
The path to landing DeRozan likely involves parting with Anfernee Simons, a move that shifts the trade from adding firepower to swapping creation styles. Simons, younger and brimming with upside, brings a different flavor to the table. His high-volume pull-up threes and explosive downhill drives stretch defenses in ways DeRozan can’t. Simons forces opponents to guard every inch of the floor, preserving the five-out spacing that defines Boston’s free-flowing offense.
DeRozan, by contrast, lives in the midrange—operating from the elbows and the nail, where help defense can collapse without leaving shooters exposed. This shift risks clogging driving lanes for Brown and White, shrinking passing windows, and altering the Celtics’ shot profile. Boston’s system thrives on quick-trigger threes and wide-open looks, but DeRozan’s limited three-point shooting (career 29.6% from deep) could invite nail help and compress spacing. Adjusting the scheme to accommodate him might work, but every tweak comes with a cost, potentially disrupting the rhythm of a roster built for modernity.
Then there’s the long-term calculus. Simons, at 26, is a rising star who aligns with Boston’s core timeline. His shooting and playmaking can grow alongside Tatum and Brown, ensuring continuity. DeRozan, at 36, is a short-term solution whose prime is waning. Trading for him could solve immediate postseason needs but risks creating regular-season challenges, especially if his fit disrupts Boston’s carefully crafted identity.
The Verdict: Simons or DeRozan?
The idea of DeRozan in Celtics green is electrifying. His clutch scoring and veteran savvy could stabilize Boston during a turbulent season, offering a bridge to Tatum’s return while keeping the team in title contention. But the cost—likely Simons—raises tough questions. Simons’ youth, shooting, and seamless fit in Boston’s system make him a safer bet for both the present and future. Trading him for DeRozan, a non-spacing scorer past his prime, could create as many problems as it solves.
Boston’s front office should stay the course. Simons’ ability to stretch defenses and grow alongside the core outweighs DeRozan’s late-game heroics. In a season focused on development and roster flexibility, patience is the smarter play. The Celtics don’t need a shockwave—they need a foundation. Simons is that foundation. DeRozan, while tempting, is a gamble Boston can afford to pass on.